5 Logical Riddles That’ll Break Your Head



These puzzles are simple enough to be solved over your coffee break. And tricky enough to stump you for hours, sending your mind on a wild goose chase! So, are you up to the challenge?!

Subscribe to Bright Side : https://goo.gl/rQTJZz

—————————————————————————————-
Our Social Media:

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/brightside/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/brightgram/
5-Minute Crafts Youtube: https://www.goo.gl/8JVmuC 

—————————————————————————————-
For more videos and articles visit:
http://www.brightside.me/

source

Fahad Hameed

Fahad Hashmi is one of the known Software Engineer and blogger likes to blog about design resources. He is passionate about collecting the awe-inspiring design tools, to help designers.He blogs only for Designers & Photographers.

44 thoughts on “5 Logical Riddles That’ll Break Your Head

  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    The Number 2 is wrong because you didn't said where the dude location,in a lot of places during winter water won't freze

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    Hard riddles XD Really broke my head. If you guys enjoyed this you might enjoy the video on my channel of 10 TRICK COMMON SENSE QUESTIONS

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    I was like.. if its a motorist why is there a care in the picture….

    Dafuq

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    I couldn't deal with all of the riddles of the video that led me here but now I know why, the video speed was set on 2, still got 3 of of em right

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    couldnt be bothered watching after first riddle. i solved it before the question mentioned the kid.

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    not really Logic riddles more like math and word problems

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    The riddle 5 is flawed. A lot of people, put in spot 1 are too dumb to realize what color they have, even if they see the same color on the head of the 2 in front of them. So the second person, will shout out the wrong color.

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    #4 doesn't make sense. The question says only 1 witness got both right, the others had one right and one wrong. The answer means that there is no witness who was correct. #1 said Blue & Man, (man is wrong). #2 said Fast with Headlights (Headlights is wrong). #3 said License Plates and Slow (slow is wrong). #4 said Toyota and Headlights off (Toyota is wrong). #5 said No Plates and Woman (No plates is wrong). #6 said Grey and Ford (Grey is wrong). … all 6 witnesses are half wrong.

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    Riddle 4 is flawed. The last witness originally said GRAY Ford, not blue, so no one could have figured it out—unless one assumed the policeman was not reliable. Then and only then could someone come to a conclusion, which would have been a gray Ford with no plates, driven slowly away by a man.

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    The bonus riddle at the end has another answer . . . they all BREATH at the same time too!!!

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    I would like to dispute the answer for "Identify the Culprit" I'm not saying that the answer you gave is wrong, but I would say that it is not the ONLY possible solution based on all the details provided in the riddle. I believe there is a valid reason that the statement made by the Policeman might not be relevant and therefore should not automatically be used as the primary reason to start eliminating other solutions from the six witnesses.

    In order to get the solution you gave, you must assume two things, first that the Policeman's statement was trustworthy (as you state) and secondly that the vehicle he saw driving away from the scene of the accident was actually driving away from the scene at the same speed it was driving when the pedestrian was actually hit. Since the riddle states very clearly that the accident itself was witnessed by the six bystanders (witnesses), it could have been possible and maybe even likely that the vehicle was driving slowly when the accident occurred and that the vehicle then (without stopping) sped up to a high speed in order to get away from the scene of the accident as quickly as possible. I believe the officers statement should not be required to get the answer because the officer has no proof of the cars speed at the exact time the accident occurred, the policeman only saw the car driving away from the scene of the accident, it doesn't say that he saw the accident or the speed the car was driving at the time the accident occurred. Because of these facts, any statements made by the officer concerning the speed at the time of the accident would be based purely his opinion and not on facts. Based on this possible scenario with the police officers statement not being required or accepted as the truth, another solution to the riddle that meets all of your riddles criteria can still be determined. I have provided a second possible solution with it's explanation below:

    Witness # 1 was telling the truth about it being a Man driver (but lying about the car's color of blue), and
    Witness # 2 was correct that the headlights were "OFF"(wrong about the speed of the car being fast),
    witness # 3 was correct that the speed was SLOW (and wrong when they said there was a license plate on the car),
    witness 4 who also correctly said the headlights were off, (and lied about it being a Toyota)
    witness # 5 was correct about there being no license plate (but they were wrong about the woman driving) and
    witness # 6 was the only witness telling the fully correct statement with the truth about the car being Both Gray and a Ford.

    I think as long as the riddle is unclear about what the Policeman actually saw, then it should not be required to use the policeman's reported details to determine the answer to this riddle. I would hate to see this poor woman driver of a Blue Ford go to jail because a police officer reported that he saw her leaving the scene of the accident in a hurry. Everyone wants to see the case solved and have someone held accountable as quickly as possible for the death of the poor individual who got run over, but we should never assume that the Police officer is truthful without actually knowing exactly what he saw.
    If we take the police officers report as truthful without all the evidence, it may be possible that the real criminal, a male driver of a Gray Ford could be getting away with a hit and run just because everyone wanted to see the case get solved using the testimony of a police officer who it turns out was simply stating his opinion based on a car he saw leaving the scene of the accident in a big hurry. We have enough innocent people in our prisons, we don't need to start adding more on the basis of one police officers opinions and not based on all the facts of the case.

    Good Job on the rest of the riddles I enjoyed them all, and had fun solving them.

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    5:20 Collision* – an accident implies that there was nobody to blame.

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    I said that everyone on Earth simultaneously experiences gravitational force… I'm not wrong.

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    in the begging of the car riddle, they said it was a grey ford, at the end it was a BLUE ford???!!!

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    how are we to assume the river was iced over? the majority of rivers in the world never ice over.

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    just pointing out, for the final riddle multiple things apply, for instance we are all constantly in motion sense earth is moving and we are all on it

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    nobody could get all of these correct with the same answers as the guy talking due to all the of variables. Example; on the very last question I said that all the people on earth were breathing. The guy said they were all getting older and someone else said they were living. There really wasn't just one right answer.

    Reply
  • September 11, 2017 at 4:05 pm
    Permalink

    I got the first one! Does that make me a genius or something?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *